Characteristics of COVID-19 Clinical Trials in China Based on the Registration Data on ChiCTR and ClinicalTrials.gov
subject: clinical trial, randomized, interventional, Blinding, COVID-19
description: Jihan Huang,1,* Yingchun He,1,* Qianmin Su,2 Juan Yang1 1Center for Drug Clinical Research, Institute of Interdisciplinary Integrative Medicine Research, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Computer in College of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Jihan Huang; Juan YangCenter for Drug Clinical Research, Institute of Interdisciplinary Integrative Medicine Research, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, #1200 Cailun Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai 201203, People’s Republic of ChinaTel +86 21 51322420Email huangjihan@shutcm.edu.cn; janeyang5006@163.comObjective: This study aimed to evaluate the fundamental characteristics of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) clinical trials registered in China.Methods: COVID-19 clinical trials registered in China were analyzed from databases on ChiCTR and ClinicalTrials.gov. The study designs, samples, primary end points, and intervention measures were evaluated.Results: In total, 262 intervention clinical trials were retrieved on March 10, 2020. Overall, 181 (69.1%) trials involved two groups, 200 (76.3%) trials were randomized parallel trials, 24 (9.2%) trials were double blind, and 60.3% of trials included ≤ 100 participants. Sixty (22.9%) trials considered symptom improvement as the primary endpoint and 43 (16.4%) trials considered the rate or time at which the subjects became virus-free as the primary endpoint. Of 262 intervention studies, chemical drugs and biological products were studied in 105 (40.1%) intervention studies, of which antiviral drugs accounted for 15.3% and malaria drugs accounted for 8.4% of the studies. Among all trials, 27.9% of the studies used traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), 10.3% used cell therapy, and 5.0% used plasma therapy.Conclusion: This study is the firs…
creator: Yang J, He Y., Huang J, Su Q
source: Drug Design, Development and Therapy
publisher: Dove Medical Press
date: 2020
coverage: Therapeutics. Pharmacology